A few new techniques have been proposed for store network finance (SCF) with bank credits, yet not even one of them specifies how to take care of the borrowers' ethical risk issues in SCF. This paper looks at the ethical danger issue in production network supporting with acquirement agreement (or buy request). We show that since store network is an up-down coordinated structure, while supporting with the acquisition contract, the provider's work checking undertaking can be delivered to the acquirement contract, which can get the provider's ideal exertion and capital decisions underway. Subsequently, contrasted with discrete loaning, the provider's credit apportioning issue can be relieved, and above all, banks' under-assessment on the provider's default risk and the over-assessment on the retailer's default chance will both abatement. We further demonstrate the way that the retailer's corporate social obligation consumption can expand buyers' memorability, subsequently while confronting request shocks emerging from shopper's unforeseen worries, the retailer can more readily settle the firm worth. With expanding discount cost levels, contracts for contrast and sliding premia progressively lead to veering organization expenses and, subsequently, expenses for purchasers. The strike cost and cost for customers under agreements for distinction stay consistent, as expenses of the innovation don't change with the discount cost level. Notwithstanding, while sliding premia are set up, the strike cost declines, as extra incomes are gotten in discount markets on occasion when discount costs surpass the strike cost. However, the decrease in the strike cost just somewhat makes up for the expansion in discount cost levels.